Professor Maurer's Blog

A SCAD blog for class resources

Why is it animated?

Can all stories be animated? Yes. Should all stories be animated? Probably not. In this post I want to present a prezi that I did for a recent lecture to help address this question that all of my students fear (and to be truthful so do I) and attempt to offer some guidelines to help us all.

I gave an hour and a half lecture on this topic this last thursday, April 18th at the CAS (Contemporary Animation Society) at SCAD. We had about 30 or so people attending. It was well received and the research I have been doing for my next film Unstitched, regarding why I am making animated films really help formulate the body of this talk.

Here’s the prezi I have online for the slide show-

http://prezi.com/1ltqwideiqno/why-make-animated-film/?kw=view-1ltqwideiqno&rc=ref-38432705

Happy thinking!

J

posted by jmaurer in Musings,Weekly update and have Comments Off

Research and brain dumping

Well I’ve been in a decent research mode this past week, reading, watching and thinking. My current process involves sitting in my studio and listening to discussions online about story, Alzheimers, and neurological sciencey type stuff. With the occasional reading of an article interjected. I am finding that it helps to notate big – so I put up a white board to catch my thoughts and musings. Below are the first three notes captured.

For some reason I find the process of standing, pacing and writing on the wall stimulating and helpful. I tend to write something and then stare at the board for several minutes digesting what I scribbled there. I will continue to post up my notes as I create them, and I’m seriously considering painting one entire wall of my studio with dry erase paint.

J

WhiteBoardNotes_001 WhiteBoardNotes_002 WhiteBoardNotes_003

posted by jmaurer in White board notes and have Comments Off

What does it take to make a short film?

Guts? Time? Money? Creativity? Talent?

Nah, just some form of recording device and the ability to hit the record button. Just look at youTube – go on do it. You know you want to get sucked into the giant media noise whirlpool that is youTube. Millions of people are doing it everyday. Uploading their wedding videos or vacation videos for all their friends to see, or the random collection of images set to their favorite Dave Matthews song and lets not start talking about the cat videos or god help us the random fad of the moment from gangnam style to the harlem shake…

Wait did you think I meant a good short film? Oh…. well then we should be looking on Vimeo right? Ha, one service is just like another -full of content, full of noise. There has never been a time like now, where ANYONE can be a film maker. Once the camera became portable all that was missing was a distribution source widely accessible by the world and boooooommmm!!! Welcome to the media noise of the 21st century. Thank you internet.

So what does it take, really? Have you figured it out yet? It’s simple really, all of those millions of people posting their films up on youTube have it figured, most of them don’t even realize that they are making films. But before I give it to you lets ask ourselves what is a film or better yet let’s call it what they used to call it a motion picture, you’ll see why in a second.

Dictionary.com (god I love the internet) defines it as -

motion picture

1. A sequence of consecutive pictures of objects photographed in motion by a specially designed camera (motion-picture camera)  and thrown on a screen by a projector (motion-picture projector)  in such rapid succession as to give the illusion of natural movement.

Most people wouldn’t call the noise on youTube – films or motion pictures for that matter but technically by definition they are just that. So if we all agree that the media you see on youTube is by definition moving pictures but not necessarily film – what exactly then would be the current definition of film? What makes a film more than just a collection of moving images? What’s the difference between a film, movie, and video? Semantics really, but important semantics.

I think it can be argued that culturally we associate the term video with low-end, cheap do it yourself types of entertainment -ie home video, or video rental-they are things to be had easily by all. Where as with movie it harkens to theatrical, fun, entertainment only in select areas. We think of summer movies, and the by-gone era of drive-in movies, horror movies, comedies, etc. Where as film takes us way back-back to a time where it was art. An analog, celluloid process projected in small art houses for a treasured few. The very word film makes us think artsy, dramatic, special.

Films are for small groups of people, tailored to their tastes or those who share similar tastes to the film makers. Movies are for the general public, the consumer. Videos – well anybody will watch that trash. There is a reason they still call them film festivals and not video festivals. Or why we choose to call ourselves film makers and not video makers. See my point? By simply calling it a film, we elevate the perceived value of the film even before creating it. This also invariably can cause the film maker to impose a certain level of unrealistic expectations upon himself regarding the films quality and impact on society as a work of art, thereby causing a significant amount of completion anxiety to occur. More on this concept in later posts -for now back on topic.

So at the core it takes three things to make a film, movie or a video (you’ll find that three’s are a pattern with me) -

Motivation – something that causes a person to act in a certain way, do acertain thing, etc.; incentive.

Expression – to set forth the opinions, feelings, etc., of oneself, as in speaking, writing, or painting.

Production - the act of producing; creation; manufacture.

Technically when you look over most youTube videos, these three things exist. Yes even the cat-tastic, gangnam dancing wacko who wants you to pay attention to him doing inane, silly stuff. They all are motivated, expressive, and definitely have production, but most of them we wouldn’t call a film. So there must be something extra – something more. Three things actually (come on you knew that was coming didn’t you? Don’t lie. ) and they work as a range involving the analytical depth of each of the three categories – motivation, expression, production.

Casual - happening by chance; without definite or serious intention; careless or offhand

Common - widespread; general; ordinary

Critical - containing careful or analytical evaluations

So the range of analytical depth goes from casual to common to critical. I would argue that casual is equal to what we call video, common is equal to what we call movies and critical is equal to what we call film. Keep in mind that this range is not associated with quality or entertainment value but simply designed to help us to clearly identify the differences.

Q: So what does it take to make a short film?

A: A critical look at one’s motivation, expression, and production when designing a short duration moving picture.

Now that we have that established we can begin to muse upon next weeks update – Why is your film animated?

Stay tuned!

Prof J

posted by jmaurer in Musings,Weekly update and have Comments Off

The beginning…

Welcome to the beginning – its’ well the start. Here I will attempt a weekly progress update on current projects, thoughts and ideas as they relate to my endeavors on the educational front with SCAD. The main bulk will be involving my new upcoming short film project – Unstitched.

Stay tuned – update posts will happy each Sunday evening. Till then stay frosty.

Prof J

posted by jmaurer in Uncategorized and have Comments Off